It’s been available on desktop for many moons in the form of Twitter Lite, but now, the so-called ‘new’ Twitter interface is rapidly being forced upon desktop users as the only fully-featured environment. It’s not just a visual redesign. It’s a completely different way of delivering content. And whether you like the ‘new’ Twitter or not, the chances of the old desktop site surviving in any form whatsoever are basically nil.
“No DMs!”; long form – “No Direct Messages!“… It’s a prominent chant in certain pockets of the vast Twitter userbase, but why only certain pockets? And is the “No DMs!” admonishment really a necessary inclusion in a Twitter bio? Let’s mull it over…
“No DMs” is much more common among women than among men, which suggests the phrase is largely rooted in a male predatory issue.
The frequent coupling of “No DMs” with “No dick pics” further supports that suggestion. A lot of men do try to use Twitter as a dating site, or a ‘perving’ site, or a ‘flashing’ site, or at least a means to avail themselves of female emotional comforts without having to pay for a premium rate service. However, at first glance, there appears to be some illogicality to the way in which “No DMs” warnings are distributed… Continue reading What Does “No DMs” Really Mean in a Twitter Bio?→
The “privacy” model has become a default business strategy for new search engines. Why? Because it sells. Given the typically inferior quality of their results, and their often uninspiring user-experience, “private search engines” routinely over-achieve in terms of growth. So unless they have a revolutionary new concept, anyone entering today’s search market is almost compelled to trade on privacy.
Deleting a social media account, or the content within it, has become a hot privacy topic in recent times. As more and more stories surface about the extent to which cyber giants collect and use our personal information, we’ve let the shock push us towards reflex action. How dare they quietly store private call logs and precise location info from our mobile phones, we think. How dare they record every move we make with a mouse, and tail us around the web logging our various site visits.
Preventative articles about hacking often lead on the corny old line about not clicking links in suspicious emails. The reality is, of course, that no one ever would. People click hackers’ links because they don’t appear suspicious. But what if we could stop those dodgy emails from reaching us in the first place?…
DON’T BE DISTRACTED FROM THE WIDER ISSUES
One of the red herrings which I think has taken many people’s eyes of the real ball of security in recent times has been two-factor authentication. That’s the process where you receive a code by text to your phone each time you want to log in. Not only is this unnecessary, it’s also inconvenient, and it may place you at serious risk of losing account access altogether.
Don’t you just love the way GDPR has forced the data mining giants of cyberspace to begrudgingly provide us with more detailed privacy disclosures and a little “Get Lost Peeping Tom!” button? A handy means for us to reclaim at least some of our privacy and limit the amount of our personal data the companies can collect or preseve?
Of course, most businesses are only telling us as much as the law says they have to tell us, and plenty of information about newer tracking technologies is flying under the radar. But GDPR’s tighter data regulation is a step in the right direction, and the general fuss it’s created has prompted a lot of us to pay more attention to web tracking. We’re better understanding our rights as site users and visitors, as well as our responsibilities as site administrators. Continue reading How To Opt Out Of WordPress.com’s Internal Analytics Tracking→
If you’re an averagely engaged Internet user, the number of times you’ll have been asked for your phone number in the name of security has probably run beyond count. And yet some of the online providers who ask for this additional data, have been hacked. Continue reading Has Scareware Gone Mainstream?→